<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1669</Issn>
				<Volume>21</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Some Contribution to Rational Design of Piled Raft Foundation for Oil Storage Tanks on Non-Liquefiable Ground: Application of Dynamic Centrifuge Modeling</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>9</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">243313</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.48303/jsee.2019.243313</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Mohammad Sadegh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sahraeian</LastName>
<Affiliation>Shiraz University of Technology</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Jiro</FirstName>
					<LastName>Takemura</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tokyo Institute of
Technology</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Some level of settlement is allowed in the design of oil tanks if uneven settlement is&lt;br /&gt;controlled within allowable values. Considering the critical condition of Piled Raft&lt;br /&gt;Foundation (PRF), that is, secure contact of raft base to the ground surface, PRF is&lt;br /&gt;considered as one of the rational foundations for the oil tanks. However, PRF has a&lt;br /&gt;complicated interaction with soil under horizontal seismic loading. Regarding this&lt;br /&gt;complexity, the main concern in use of PRF for oil tanks is proper design of&lt;br /&gt;this foundation system. In this study, a series of centrifuge tests were performed to&lt;br /&gt;investigate the mechanical behavior of oil tanks supported by PRF on non-liquefiable&lt;br /&gt;sand. Using the observed results, such as accelerations of the tank and ground&lt;br /&gt;and displacements of the foundation, some practical hints for reasonable design of&lt;br /&gt;piled raft foundation for oil tanks on non-liquefiable sand are discussed. According&lt;br /&gt;to the results of this study, the main concern in the rational design of the foundation&lt;br /&gt;is piles&#039; design and their punching effect on the raft, in case of PRF of oil tank on&lt;br /&gt;non-liquefiable sand.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Oil storage tank</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Design of piled raft foundation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Centrifuge Modeling</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.jsee.ir/article_243313_6afd6a9a246f8e20809f0dcc854303e2.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1669</Issn>
				<Volume>21</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Buckling Response and Elastic Stiffness of Butterfly Dampers</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>11</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>20</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">243312</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.48303/jsee.2019.243312</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Behrokh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hosseini Hashemi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of
Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES)</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Babak</FirstName>
					<LastName>Keykhosrokiany</LastName>
<Affiliation>Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of
Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES)</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Butterfly dampers dissipate energy through the flexural, shear, or axial response of&lt;br /&gt;the strips when the device is subjected to inelastic cyclic deformation. The buckling&lt;br /&gt;response, elastic stiffness, and cyclic performance of non-uniform steel butterfly&lt;br /&gt;dampers have been studied in this paper. Validated material and geometric nonlinear&lt;br /&gt;finite element models in the ABAQUS has been used to perform a comprehensive&lt;br /&gt;parametric study on a wide range of geometrical parameters to evaluate the&lt;br /&gt;response of non-compact butterfly dampers. The results showed that although the&lt;br /&gt;low-cycle-fatigue response of butterfly dampers can be improved by altering the side&lt;br /&gt;edge shapes, the buckling capacity and elastic stiffness of non-uniform strips would&lt;br /&gt;decrease in comparison with uniform ones. Hence several analytical equations were&lt;br /&gt;provided to quantitative prediction of the buckling capacity and elastic stiffness of&lt;br /&gt;butterfly dampers.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Buckling</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Finite element updating</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Butterfly damper</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Yielding device</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.jsee.ir/article_243312_15909b79b75425397298da722e80c3c2.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1669</Issn>
				<Volume>21</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Modification of Park-Ang Damage Index to Accommodate Effect of Aftershocks on RC Structures</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>21</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>35</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">243311</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.48303/jsee.2019.243311</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Morteza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bastami</LastName>
<Affiliation>International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES)</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-7133-0977</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Behrouz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ebrahimi</LastName>
<Affiliation>University of Kurdistan</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>07</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Seismic design codes do not consider the effects of aftershocks on structures.&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, most damage estimation methods disregard the effects of consecutive&lt;br /&gt;earthquakes. Recent earthquakes have demonstrated that the aftershocks can cause&lt;br /&gt;major damage to mainshock-damaged structures. After a strong seismic event, it&lt;br /&gt;should be determined if a mainshock-damaged building is safe for reoccupation in&lt;br /&gt;the event of aftershocks. This study examined the effects of both the main shock and&lt;br /&gt;aftershocks on the damage index of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. Records&lt;br /&gt;from 19 mainshocks that occurred in the Japan seismic region with moment&lt;br /&gt;magnitudes of greater than 4 were examined. More than 100 acceleration time&lt;br /&gt;series from these events (mainshock + aftershock events) were applied to evaluate&lt;br /&gt;the damage index. Seismic damage analysis was performed on a series of RC&lt;br /&gt;columns and RC frames. The natural period of these structures varied from 0.1 to 2.5&lt;br /&gt;s. The damage index introduced by Park and Ang was employed to estimate the&lt;br /&gt;structural damage. Acceleration time series were applied to the structures in two&lt;br /&gt;steps. First, only mainshocks were applied to the structures and the damage index&lt;br /&gt;was obtained. Next, both the mainshock and aftershocks were applied to the&lt;br /&gt;structures and structures damaged by a mainshock were analyzed under periodic&lt;br /&gt;aftershock events. The results showed that the increase in structural period and the&lt;br /&gt;PGA of the aftershocks amplified the damage index under the effects of the&lt;br /&gt;aftershocks. A modification to Park-Ang damage index is proposed using a dimensionless&lt;br /&gt;term to accommodate the effect of aftershocks.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Aftershock</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Damage Index</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">RC structures</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Natural Period</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.jsee.ir/article_243311_eeb6523b0498555761717a55e6041609.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1669</Issn>
				<Volume>21</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Initial Solution for Designing a Soft Substructure in a Mass Isolation System with Consideration of Stability Constraints</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>37</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>48</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">243310</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.48303/jsee.2019.243310</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Boujary</LastName>
<Affiliation>International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES)</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mansour</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ziyaeifar</LastName>
<Affiliation>International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES)</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The new techniques in seismic design of structures are usually attributed to high&lt;br /&gt;damping ratios. Mass isolation of structures is one of the new techniques in seismic&lt;br /&gt;design of structures that focuses on the mass of the structure as the main target for&lt;br /&gt;seismic isolation and reducing earthquake effects on buildings. Mass Isolation&lt;br /&gt;System (MIS) consists of two stiff and soft substructures connected by a viscous&lt;br /&gt;damper. The mass subsystem comprises the main mass of the structure, which is&lt;br /&gt;attached to a frame with a low stiffness by a separation mechanism at the height of&lt;br /&gt;the structure including viscous dampers to a stiffness subsystem consisting of a&lt;br /&gt;moment or braced frame system with great stiffness. In this paper, the aim is to&lt;br /&gt;present a simple preliminary design method based on the normalized pushover&lt;br /&gt;curve. The most important problems for increasing the period of the soft structure&lt;br /&gt;are deformation and structural stability. This paper presents a preliminary design&lt;br /&gt;solution for a soft substructure of the Mass Isolation System (MIS) with consideration&lt;br /&gt;of stability constraints. To this end, the paper presents mathematical&lt;br /&gt;relationships to calculate the period of the structure followed by proposing a simple&lt;br /&gt;solution for the design of the soft substructure.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mass Isolation System</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">stability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Period</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">P-? effect</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Collapse prevention</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.jsee.ir/article_243310_e2aaeff5f82d78bf62c3e7ee8b297ec1.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1669</Issn>
				<Volume>21</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Parallelization of 3D Pseudo-Bending Algorithm for Seismic Ray Tracing</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>49</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>56</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">243309</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.48303/jsee.2019.243309</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Madineh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Banihashem Kalibar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Earthquake Research Center, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hossein</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadeghi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sayyed Keivan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hosseini</LastName>
<Affiliation>Earthquake Research Center, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Bending ray tracing is a technique for finding the shortest travel path from a fixed source to a fixed receiver. Ray tracing is a time-consuming computing technique in applications such as tomography, which involves a large number of source-receiver pairs. In this regard, parallel programming makes it possible to reduce the running time of a serial program significantly by breaking it into a discrete series and solve it by different processing units simultaneously. Along with the rapid development of parallel computing technologies in both hardware architecture and system software, parallel computing is growing rapidly in a broad range of scientific computing applications. In this paper, the parallelization of pseudo-bending ray tracing algorithm is presented using both task and data parallelization strategies. In the task parallelization, the bending calculation of each path section is distributed to different processors, while in the data parallelization, due to the independent calculation for each pair of source-receiver, the data parts are distributed to different processors. The performance results of the parallelizations of the pseudo-bending algorithm for ray tracing in a 3D velocity model are shown using OpenMP, which is an application programming interface for shared memory multiprocessing programming. The advantage of OpenMP programming model is its simplicity to parallelize an existing serial code. This is especially useful now that multi-core CPUs are common. The results show the effectiveness and efficiency of the approach. A significant speedup in the ray tracing implementation is achieved. This reduction in computation time allows more rays to be traced, which directly affects the accuracy of tomography results. Sufficient ray coverage is needed to obtain tomography images with perfect resolution.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ray tracing</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Bending</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">tomography</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Parallel programming</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Multiprocessor</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Open MP</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.jsee.ir/article_243309_7adc277687d79d5cc80465c5f389ae78.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-1669</Issn>
				<Volume>21</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Interaction of Underground Tunnel and Existing Shallow Foundations Affected by Normal Faults</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>57</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>62</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">243314</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.48303/jsee.2019.243314</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sadegh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghavami</LastName>
<Affiliation>School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Saeedi Azizkandi</LastName>
<Affiliation>School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Hassan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Baziar</LastName>
<Affiliation>School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1236-3987</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehrdad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rajabi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>03</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In major earthquakes, permanent ground deformations due to the fault movements&lt;br /&gt;cause serious damage to the foundations and structures. Although many of&lt;br /&gt;structural seismic design codes have recommended avoiding the construction of&lt;br /&gt;structures in the adjacent to active faults, it is not always a viable option. For&lt;br /&gt;example, the lifeline facilities such as gas tunnels, water supply tunnels and&lt;br /&gt;transportation tunnels, due to their extensive length, cannot often avoid crossing&lt;br /&gt;active faults. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the interaction mechanism&lt;br /&gt;between structures and fault rupture for effective design to reduce the hazards&lt;br /&gt;associated with surface faulting. This study investigates the interactions of&lt;br /&gt;underground tunnel and existing shallow foundation affected by normal fault&lt;br /&gt;using the finite element method. The results show that the existence of a tunnel&lt;br /&gt;changes the fault rupture path and in some cases can increase the foundation&lt;br /&gt;rotation. It causes the occurrence of severe level of damage to the structure and&lt;br /&gt;increases fear about its instability.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Normal fault</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Shallow Foundation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Underground tunnel</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Interaction</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.jsee.ir/article_243314_3d990cd11ee0cd6f94c311955e2a49c9.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
