Solution of Double Criterion Problem about Selecting Passive Control Device of Cable-Stayed Bridges

Document Type : Structural Earthquake Engineering


University of Tehran


Seismic control strategy of cable-stayed bridges is usually performed by implementing bearing devices in the connection point of deck and pylon. In this case, owners usually refuse to use superior seismic strategy because of its cost. In Mashhad cable-stayed bridge as a case study, Pot Bearing device has been used probably because of the lower costs, while it is not very effective in seismic behavior. However, Elastomeric Bearing Pads or Lead Rubber Bearings are more effective in absorbing earthquake's energy due to higher damping. Therefore, in this paper, we are going to thoroughly solve a double criterion problem about selecting bearing devices of Mashhad bridge considering the construction costs and earthquake losses. Indeed, if economically justified, this paper tries to improve the passive seismic control device of the Mashhad bridge from its current Pot Bearing to another type. The economic justification is studied using seismic risk assessment process alongside the simultaneous analysis of costs and losses. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to design and control the bridge for seismic behavior with three aforementioned different bearing devices. Then, the seismic risk assessment process is performed for each case. The final results of seismic risk assessment process are achieved as total loss ratio curves. Then, the proposed Cost-Loss-Benefit (CLB) method will compare the three cases by defining Benefit Ratio (BR) as a profitability measure. The final results indicate that both of the alternative cases increase the costs and decrease the losses compared to the existing Pot Bearings. However, simultaneously considering the costs and losses, the BR coefficient reveals the profitability of the use of Lead Rubber Bearings in Mashhad cable-stayed bridge.


  1. Chang, K.C., Mo, Y.L., Chen, C.C., Lai, L.C., and Chou, C.C. (2004) Lessons learned from the damaged Chi-Lu cable-stayed bridge. J. Bridge Eng., 9(4), 343-352.
  2. Casciati, F., Cimellaro, G.P., and Domaneschi, M. (2008) Seismic reliability of a cable-stayed bridge retrofitted with hysteretic devices. Comput. Struct., 86(17), 1769-1781.
  3. Pang, Y., Wu, X., Shen, G., and Yuan, W. (2013) Seismic fragility analysis of cable-stayed bridges considering different sources of uncertainties. J. Bridge Eng., 19(4).
  4. Ren, W.X., and Obata, M. (1999) Elastic-plastic seismic behavior of long span cable-stayed bridges. J. Bridge Eng., 3(194), 194-203.
  5. Nazmy, A.S. and Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. (1990) Three-dimensional nonlinear static analysis of cable-stayed bridges. Comp. and Struct., 34(2), 257-271.
  6. Mander, J.B., Dhakal, R.P., Mashiko, N., and Solberg, K.M. (2007) Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges. Engineering Structures, 29(10), 2662-2672.
  7. Nielson, B.G. and DesRoches, R. (2007) Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(6), 823-839.
  8. Olmos, B.A., Jara, J.M., and Jara, M. (2012) Influence of some relevant parameters in the seismic vulnerability of RC bridges. Earthq. Struct., 3(3-4), 365-381.
  9. Shinozuka, M., Kim, S.H., Kushiyama, S., and Yi, J.H. (2002) Fragility curves of concrete bridges retrofitted by column jacketing. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1(2), 195-205.
  10. Kim, D., Yi, J.H., Seo, H.Y., and Chang, C. (2008) Earthquake risk assessment of seismically isolated extradosed bridges with lead rubber bearings. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 29(6), 689-707.
  11. Caltrans, S.D.C. (2004) Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria version 1.3. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California.
  12. Aviram, A., Mackie, K., and Stojadinovic, B. (2008) Guidelines for Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures in California . Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley.
  13. Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI) (2005) SAP2000-Linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis and design of three-dimensional structures: basic analysis reference manual. CSI, Berkeley, California.
  14. Calvi, G.M., Sullivan, T.J., and Villani, A. (2010) Conceptual seismic design of cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14(8), 1139-1171.
  15. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., and Park, R. (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826.
  16. Oladimeji Fasheyi, A. (2012) Bridge Bearings: Merits, Demerits. M.Sc. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
  17. Makris, N. and Zhang, J. (2002) Structural Characterization and Seismic Response Analysis of a Highway Overcrossing Equipped with Elastomeric Bearings and Fluid Dampers: A Case Study (Techincal Report). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER, University of California, Berkeley.
  18. Agrawal, A.K., Ghosn, M., Alampalli, S., and Pan, Y. (2012) Seismic fragility of retrofitted multispan continuous steel bridges in New York. J. Bridge Eng., 17(4), 562-575.
  19. Tang, M. (1992) Guidelines for the Design of Cable-Stayed Bridges. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
  20. Kawashima, K., Unjoh, S., and Tunomoto, M. (1993) Estimation of damping ratio of cablestayed bridges for seismic design. J. Struct. Eng., 119(4), 1015-1031.
  21. Ross, S.M. (2009) Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. Academic Press, New York. USA.
  22. Gholipour, Y., Bozorgnia, Y., Rahnamaa, M., and Berberian, M. (2008) Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, Phase I-Greater Tehran Regions. Technical Report, College of Engineering, University of Tehran.