Evaluation of Design Parameters on PBD of RC Buildings with Masonry Infills

Document Type : Structural Earthquake Engineering




Masonry infills are provided in almost all residential buildings as enclosure. The building analysis and designs are carried out considering a representativeempirical time period. The yield strength of URM infilled frames is much higher, and yield displacement is smaller for bare frames, providing higher ductility. The extent of damage to infill elements define the hazard level imposed and the corresponding risk associated with it. In this paper, the performance of RC building with infills is evaluated using pushover analysis for various seismic hazard levels and loading patterns as per ATC40 & FEMA356 in ETABS. A seven storey regular RC building is located in seismic zone-V (IS1893-0.36 g). The parameters of evaluation include time period formula, modelling technique of infill, masonry units used in practice, and location of openings in building. The code provisions for open ground storey buildings have been evaluated for performance assessment. Under 0.36 g hazard level, the building frame satisfied Life Safety performance objective under the three lateral loading patterns. It is found that AAC masonry blocks least affect the performance of frame elements and also the required failure mode for the structure.


  1. Raisinghani, B.M. (2014) Influence of Parameters on Performance Evaluation of RC Buildings. 5th Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering
  2. (5ACEE), Taipei, Taiwan.
  3. Raisinghani, B.M. and Purohit, S.P. (2016) Influence of parameters on performance evaluation of designed RC buildings: seismic hazard.
  4. International Journal of Structural Engineering, 7(4), Inderscience Publishers, Switzerland.
  5. Polyakov, S.V. (1960) On the Interaction between Masonry Filler Walls and Enclosing Frame when Loaded in the Plane of the Wall. Translation in Earthquake Engineering, EERI, San Francisco.
  6. Holmes, M. (1961) Steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 19, 473-478.
  7. Smith, B.S. (1962) Lateral stiffness of infilled frames. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 88(6), 183-199.
  8. Smith, B.S. and Carter, C. (1969) A method of analysis for infilled frames. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers, 44(1), 31-48.
  9. Mainstone, R.J. and Weeks, G.A. (1974) The influence of bounding frame on the racking stiffness and strength of brick walls. Proceedings of the 2nd International Brick Masonry Conference, Building Research Establishment, Watford, England, 165-171.
  10. Liauw, T.C. and Kwan, K.H. (1984) Nonlinear behaviour of non-integral infilled frames. Computers & Structures, 18, 551-560.
  11. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M. (1992) Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Durrani, A.J. and Luo, Y.H. (1994) Seismic Retrofit of Flat-slab Buildings with Masonry Infills. NCEER workshop on seismic response in Masonry Infills.
  13. Thiruvengadam, V. (1985) On the natural frequencies of infilled frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Wiley Publisher, 13(3), 401-419.
  14. Chrysostomou, C.Z, Gergely, P., and Abel, J.F. (2002) A six-strut model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel infilled frames. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, World Scientific Publishing, 2(03), 335-353.
  15. Abdelkareem, K.H., Abdel Sayed, F.K., Ahmed, M.H., and AL-Mekhlafy, N. (2013) Equivalent strut width for modelling RC infilled frames. Journal of Engineer ing Science, Assiut University, 41(3), 851-866.
  16. Chopra, A.K. (2009) Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Ear thquake Engineering. Pearson Education, Prentice Hall.
  17. IS 1893 (2002) Part-I: Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures: General Provisions and Buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
  18. Humar, J., Lau, D., and Pierre J. (2001) Performance of buildings during 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28, 979-991.
  19. Smith, B.S. and Coull, A. (1991) Tall Buildings Structures: Analysis and Design. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  20. Crisafulli, F.J., Carr, A.J., and Park, R. (2000) Analytical modelling of infilled frame structuresa general review. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33(1), 30-47.
  21. Murthy, C.V.R., Goswami, R., Vijaynarayanan, A.R., and Mehta, V. (2013) Some Concepts in Earthquake Behavior of Buildings. National Information Centre of Earthquake Engineering, IIT Kanpur (http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/IITKGSDMA/EBB_001_30May2013.pdf).
  22. Tiedman, H. (1980) Statistical evaluation of the importance of non-structural damage to buildings. 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (7WCEE), Zurich, Switzerland.
  23. Liauw, T.C. (1980) An effective structural system against earthquakes-infilled frames. 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (7WCEE), 481-485, Turkey.
  24. Asteresis, P.G. (2011) Failure modes of infilled frames. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering (eJOSE), 11(1), 11-20.
  25. Jain, S.K. and Murthy, C.V.R. (2000) Beneficial influence of masonry infill walls on seismic performance of RC frame buildings. 12th World Conference on Ear thquake Engineering (WCEE), New-Zealand.
  26. Moretti, M. (2015) Seismic design of masonry and reinforced concrete infilled frames: a comprehensive overview. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8(4), 748-766.
  27. Jain, S.K., Kaushik, H.B., and Rai, D.C. (2008) A rational approach to analytical modeling of masonry infills in reinforced concrete frame buildings. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (14WCEE), Beijing, China.
  28. Singh, Y., Haldar, P., and Paul, D.K. (2012) Estimation of capacity curve parameters for Indian RC buildings with URM infills. 15th World Conference on Ear thquake Engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon.
  29. Mondal, G. and Jain, S.K. (2008) Lateral stiffness of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames with central opening. Ear thquake Spectra, 24(3), 701-723.
  30. Cavaleri, L., Fossetti, M., and Papia, M. (2004) Effect of vertical loads on lateral response of infilled frames. Thirteenth World Conference on Ear thquake Engineer ing (13WCEE), Vancouver, Paper No. 2931.
  31. Pujol, S., Climent, A., Rodriguez, M., and Paul Smith-Pardo, J. (2008) Masonry infill walls: an effective alternative for seismic strengthening of low-rise reinforced concrete building structures. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (14WCEE), Oct 12-17, Beijing, China.
  32. Kaushik, H.B. and Basha, S.H. (2015) Suitability of flyash brick masonry as infill in reinforced concrete frames. Materials and Structures, 49(9).
  33. Haldar, P. and Singh, Y. (2012) Modelling of URM infills and their effect on seismic behavior of RC frame buildings. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 6, 35-41.
  34. Bell, D.K. and Davidson, B.J. (2001) Evaluation of earthquake risk buildings with masonry infill panels. NZSEE Conference, Paper No. 4.02.01, New Zealand.
  35. Ozkaynak, H., Yuksel, E., Yalcin, C., Dindar, A.A., and Buyukozturk O. (2013) Masonry infill walls in reinforced concrete frames as a source of
  36. structural damping. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 43(7), 949-968.
  37. Tesfamariam, S., Goda, K., and Mondal, G. (2015) Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete frame with unreinforced masonry infill due to mainshock-aftershock earthquake sequences. Earthquake Spectra , EERI, 31(3), 1427-1449.
  38. Sucuoglu, H. (2013) Implications of masonry infill and partition damage in performance perception in residual buildings after a moderate earthquake.
  39. Earthquake Spectra , EERI, 29(2), 661-667.
  40. IS 456 (2000) Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
  41. IS 13920 (2002) Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces - Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
  42. Applied Technological Council (ATC) Seismic Per formance Evaluation of Designed RC Buildings, Publication No. 40, USA.
  43. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Publication No. 356, USA.
  44. Kaushik, H.B., Jain, S.K., and Murthy, C.V.R. (2007) Stress-Strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 728 - 739.
  45. Bose, S. and Rai, D.C. (2016) Lateral load behavior of open ground storey RC building with AAC infills in upper stories. Ear thquake Spectra, 32(3), 1653-1674.
  46. Kaushik, H.B., Jain, S.K., and Rai, D.C. (2006) Code approaches to seismic design of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames: a state of art review. Earthquake Spectra , 22(4), 961-983.
  47. IS 2185 (1983) Part-II: Specification for Hollow and Solid Lightweight Concrete Blocks. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
  48. IS 2185 (1984) Part-III: Specification for Autoclaved Cellular (Aerated) Concrete Blocks. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
  49. Kaushik, H.B., Rai, D.C., and Jain, S.K. (2009) Effectiveness of some strengthening options for masonry-infilled RC frames with open first storey.
  50. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 8,925-937.