Experimental Study of an All-Steel Two-Segment Core Buckling Restrained Brace

Document Type : Structural Earthquake Engineering




Buckling Restrained Braces (BRBs) have been exceedingly used for resisting seismic forces in framed structures because of their advantages of non-buckling and large energy absorption capacities. A type of fully steel brace has been designed in the present study that provides ease of construction and replacement of the core. The term multi-zone indicates that the part of the core undergoing plastic deformation is divided into two or more segments in order to provide a more uniform distribution of the plastic deformation. In other words, the core consists of two or more segments that can become plastic. The end parts of the core and shield are so designed as to eliminate the problems that have existed in the previous designs. The aim here is to produce a robust type of brace that can be constructed without strict building requirements, and the test results show that this has been achieved. Three ½ scale specimens were constructed for testing. These specimens were tested under quasi-static loading up to a target displacement. The results for all three specimens tested show that minimum values of parameters specified by the AISC Steel code (maximum compressive stress factor, b= 1.3, and minimum energy absorption factor h =200 ) have been achieved and in all cases they exceeded the code requirements by a large margin (here: bmax= 1.21, hmin= 1102 ). In addition, each specimen was capable of carrying several additional cycles of loading (11 or more) at the end of the test. That is, they are more robust against fatigue than that specified by the said AISC code. Cyclic behavior of the specimens showed high energy absorption capabilities with strains of up to 4.6%. Based on the test results, it can be concluded that the multi-zone core BRB's with stiffened shield and restraining device tested here are suitable for use in new buildings as well as in retrofit of existing structures. The idea of using multi-zone cores not only allows for a better distribution of plastic region, but also enables us to stabilize the shield to the core at the middle zone, where no plastic deformation takes place. In this way, the stability of the shield is achieved by a simple mechanism without requiring elaborate details of a stopper.


  1. Khatib, I., Mahin, S. (1987) Dynamic inelastic behavior of chevron braced steel frames. Fifth Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, 211-220.
  2. Wakabayashi, M., Nakamura, T. , Kashibara A., Morizono T., and Yokoyama, H. (1973) Experimental study on the elasto-plastic behavior of braces enclosed by precast concrete panels
  3. under horizontal cyclic loading Parts 1 and 2. Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan, Structural Engineering Section, 1041-1044 (in Japanese).
  4. Tremblay, R., Degrange, G., and Blouin, J. (1999)Seismic rehabilitation of a four- storey building with a stiffened bracing system. Proceedings of the 8th Canadian Conference on Earthquake
  5. Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canadian Association of Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., 549-554.
  6. Ning, M., Bin, W., Junxial, Z., Hui, L., Jinping, U., and Weibiao, Y. (2008) Full scale tests of all steel buckling restrained braces. Proceedings of 14th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering Beijing, China.
  7. Tremblay, R., Bolduc, P., Neville, R., and DeVall, R. (2006) Seismic testing and performance of buckling restrained bracing systems. Can. J. Civ. Eng., 33(1), 183-98.
  8. Razavi-S., A., Mirghaderi-S., R., and Hosseini, A. (2014) Experimental and numerical developing of reduced length buckling - restrained braced. Journal of Engineering Structures, 77, 143-160.
  9. Wang, C., Usami, T., and Funayama, J. (2012) Improving Low-Cycle Fatigue Performance of High-Performance Buckling-Restrained Braces by Toe-Finished Method. Journal of Earthquake
  10. Engineering, 16(8), 1248-1268.
  11. AISC (2010) Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. ANSI/AISC341-05, American Institute of Steel Construction.
  12. Tasi, K.C., and Huang, Y.C., and Chiang, T.C. (2012) Huge scale tests of all-steel multi-curve buckling restrained braces. The 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  13. Nakamura, H., Maeda, Y., Sasaki, T., Wada, A., Takeuchi, T., Nakata, Y., and Iwata, M. (2000) Fatigue Proper ties of Practical Scale Unbounded Brace. Nippon Steel Technical Report, No 82, July
  14. Chung, C. and Sheng, Y. (2010) Subassamblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling restrained braces. Journal of Engineering Structures, 32(8), 2108-2121.
  15. Mirtaheri, M. and Geidi, A. (2011) Experimental optimization studies on steel core lengths in buckling restrained braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67(8), 1244-1253.
  16. Hoveidae, N., Rafezy, B. (2012) Overall buckling behavior of all-steel buckling restrained braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 79, 151-158.
  17. Taranath, B.S. (2016) Structural Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings: Steel and Composite Construction. CRC Press.
  18. Takeuchi, T., Ozaki, H., and Matsui, R. (2014) Out-of-plane stability of buckling-restrained braces including moment transfer capacity. Ear thquake Engineer ing and Structural Dynamics, 43(6), 851-869, Wiley Online Library.
  19. Zhao, J., Wu, B., and Ou, J. (2014) A practical and unified global stability design method of buckling-restrained braces: discussion on pinned connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 95, 106-115, Elsevier.
  20. Della Corte, G. and D'Aniello, M. (2015) Field testing of all-steel buckling-restrained braces applied to a damaged reinforced concrete building, Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(1).