Earthquake Building Damage Detection Using VHR Satellite Data (Case Study: Two Villages Near Sarpol-e Zahab)

Document Type : Risk Management

Authors

International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran

Abstract

A strong earthquake with Mw 7.3 occurred on Nov. 12, 2017, at the Iran-Iraq border where the city of Sarpol-e Zahab (24 km from the epicenter) and many other towns and villages were affected severely. Rapid damage mapping essentially helps to understand the location, the extent and the severity of high hit areas, and it is regarded as an important source of information in assisting proper crisis management. Rapid damage mapping can be completed according to three general methods namely; manual, semi-automated, and automated. This research explores a proposed semi-automated method that once calibrated and operational it can be utilized as an automated process. After preprocessing the satellite data, individual buildings or building parcels are identified using either some building extraction tools or with the use of some ancillary data sets. The proposed damage detection algorithm is based on deriving a set of textural indices associated to individual building or property footprints. These parameters have been input into an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for damage classification. The trained ANN created urban damage maps. For detecting significant observable physical changes/damages to the buildings, two schemes were developed: 1) by comparing the post-event with the pre-event VHR satellite images, and 2) using a post-event image only. In scheme-1, before and after images were acquired from different satellites (TripleSat_2 with 89 cm and SV1 with 50 cm spatial resolution) as input and the Overall Accuracy (OA) of the proposed damage classification was reported as 72%. The damage classification accuracy in scheme-2 produced an OA of 75%.

Keywords


  1. Gamba, P. and Casciati, F. (1998) GIS and image understanding for near-real-time earthquake damage assessment. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 64, 987-994.
  2. Saito, K., Spence, R.J., Going, C., and Markus, M. (2004) Using high-resolution satellite images for post-earthquake building damage assessment: a study following the 26 January 2001 Gujarat earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 20(1), 145-169.
  3. Yamazaki, F., Yano, Y., andMatsuoka,M. (2005) Visual damage interpretation of buildings in bam city using quickbird images following the 2003 bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21(S1), 329-336.
  4. Hisada, Y., Shibayama,A., and Ghayamghamian, M.R. (2005) Building damage and seismic intensity in Bam City from the 2003 Iran, Bam Earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 79(3 & 4), 81-94.
  5. Gusella, L.,Adams, B.J., Bitelli, G., Huyck, C.K., and Mognol, A. (2005) Object-oriented image understanding and post-earthquake damage assessment for the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 21(S1), 225-238.
  6. www.ecognition.com.
  7. Mansouri, B., Shinozuka, M., Huyck, C., and Houshmand, B. (2005) Earthquake-induced change detection in the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake by complex analysis using Envisat ASAR data. Ear thquake Spectra , 21(S1), 275-284.
  8. Mansouri, B. and Hamednia, Y. (2015) A soft computing method for damage mapping using VHR optical satellite imagery. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 8(10), 4935-4941.
  9. Mostafazadeh, M. and Mansouri, B. (2015) Object-oriented building extraction from VHR satellite data and earthquake damage detection based on textural analysis using artificial neural network. Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering, 2(1), 55-65.
  10. http://www.gosur.com/google-earth.
  11. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., and Dinstein, I.H. (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man
  12. and Cybernetics, SMC3(6), 610-621.