Development of a Practical Approach for Modeling of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings

Document Type : Technical Note

Authors

1 Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University

2 International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology

Abstract

At different parts of the world, there are many unreinforced masonry buildings have been constructed for different uses. Studies have shown the insufficiency in the design and performance of these buildings. Proper a modeling approach for nonlinear analyses of masonry buildings and seismic assessment of these buildings is necessary. This study presents a practical approach to model unreinforced masonry building. This approach considers the effects of including the lateral resistance of masonry walls in resisting seismic loads. The main aim of this article is showing the utility and efficiency of a simple method in the explanation of the behaviour of masonry buildings subjected to seismic loads. The simple models are essential because they provide easy and accessible understanding of the structural response. This approach was used to assess a common type of masonry building as a representative building of Iranian masonry schools. The results of static and dynamic nonlinear analyses show this approach offers a good balance between simplicity and accuracy and can be used for nonlinear analyses and seismic assessment of these buildings.

Keywords


  1. Borzouie, j. , Mahdizadeh, a., (2011) Peripheral Shotcrete method for rehabilitation of One Story Masonry Building. 6 th International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Tehran, Iran.
  2. TaekoTokoro, K. A., Anderson, J. C.,& Bertero, V. V. (2004) Seismic Performance of masonry Buildings and Design Implications (Report No. PEER 2004/01). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
  3. Mazzoni, S. (2006) Opensees Command Language Manual (Version 2.4.0). Location: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. [Online]. Available: http:// opensees.berkeley.edu
  4. Taucer, F.F, Spacone,E. , Filippou, F.C. (1991) A Fiber Beam-Column Element for Seismic Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures (Report No. UCB/EERC-91/17). Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  5. Waugh, J., Aaleti, S., Sritharan, S., Zhao, J., (2008) Nonlinear Analysis of Rectangular and T-Shaped Concrete Walls (Report No. ERI-09327). ISU-ERI-Ames, Iowa State University, Iowa.
  6. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2000) Prestandard and Commentary for The Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 356.
  7. Bouchard, K.M. (2007) A Performance-Based Approach to Retrofitting Unreinforced Masonry Structures for seismic Loads. Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, Northeastern University.
  8. Filippou, F. C., Popov, E. P., Bertero, V. V. (1983) Effects of Bond Deterioration on Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Joints (Report No. USB/EERC 83/19). Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
  9. Ghafory Ashtiany, M., Hatefi Ardekani, H., (2011, June) M6.5 Strong Ground Motion Data Base Scenario. Proceeding of IASPEI-IUGG 2011, Melbourne, Australia.
  10. International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. (2011) Practical Instruction for Seismic Rehabilitation of Masonry Schools. No.10289/2-2266.