Design of Mass Isolated Structures with Consideration of Stability Constraints

Document Type : Research Article


International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran


Vertical mass isolation is one of the new techniques in the seismic design of
structures that consists of two stiff and soft substructures connected by viscous dampers.
Adding to the flexibility and energy dissipation potential of the system is the main
feature of some new approaches in the seismic design of structures. Extra flexibility
helps to reduce earthquake-induced forces and accelerations in the building and
provides higher energy dissipation potential for the system (by creating large
relative deformations in the structure). Mass subsystem possesses low lateral
stiffness but carries the major part of the mass system. Stiffness subsystem, however,
controls the deformation of the mass subsystem and attributes with much higher
stiffness. In this paper, the aim is to find the limitation of the stability of a
soft structure and to obtain the maximum period available for a soft structure.
According to the studies, the most important obstruction in increasing the period
of the soft structure, assuming control of its deformation by connecting to the
stiff substructure, is to maintain the stability of the structure. In this paper, first, a
relationship has been presented to calculate the period of the structure in terms of
the stability factor that estimates the period of structure with good agreement by
analytical results. This paper deals with presenting a procedure for designing the
Mass Isolation System (MIS) with consideration of stability constraints. To this end,
the paper presents mathematical solutions to calculate the period of the structure
followed by proposing a design procedure of the soft substructure.


ASCE (2017a) Minimum Design Loads and
Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other
Structures: ASCE/SEI 7-16. In: Reston, Virginia:
Published by American Society of Civil Engineers.
2. EuroCode (2004) Design of structures for earthquake
resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic
actions and rules for buildings. EuroCode 8, 3,
229p., BSI Standards Publication.
3. Christenson, R.E., Spencer, Jr., B.F., Hori, N., and
Seto, K. (2003) Coupled building control using
acceleration feedback. Computer-Aided Civil
and Infrastructure Engineering, 18(1), 4-18,
4. Yuji, K., Keizo, N., Masanori, I., Tamotsu, M., and
Hirofumi, S. (2004) Development of connecting
type actively controlled vibration control devices
and application to high-rise triple buildings. Engineering Review, 37(1)
5. Ziyaeifar, M. (2002) Mass Isolation, concept and
techniques. European Earthquake Engineering,
2(1), 43-55.
6. Ziyaeifar, M., Gidfar, S., and Nekooei, M. (2012)
A model for mass isolation study in seismic
design of structures. Structural Control and
Health Monitoring, 19(6), 627-645, doi:http://
7. ATC-33 (1997) NEHRP Guidelines for the
Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 273).
Applied Technology Council (ATC-33 Project),
Washington, D.C., Federal Emergency Management
8. FEMA (2000) Prestandard and Commentary for
the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA
356), In Washington, D.C., Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
9. BHRC (2014) Iranian Code of Practice for
Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Standard
No. 2800. 4th Ed., Tehran: Road, Housing
and Urban Development Research Center.
10. CSI (July 2015) CSI Analysis Reference
11. ASCE (2010) Commentary for Chapters 11-22
(Seismic). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings
and Other Structures.
12. Bernal, D. (1992) Instability of buildings subjected
to earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineering,
118(8), 2239-2260, doi:
13. AISC-ANSI, A. (2010) Specification for
Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-
10). Chicago (IL), American Institute of Steel
14. Bernal, D. (1998) Instability of Buildings during
seismic response. Engineering Structures,
20(4-6), 496-502, doi:
15. Bernal, D., Nasseri, A., and Bulut, Y. (2006)
Instability inducing potential of near fault ground
motions. SMIP06 Seminar Proceedings.
16. Bernal, D. (1987) Amplification factors for
inelastic dynamic P-D effects in earthquake
analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural
Dynamics, 15, 635-651.
17. Castilla, E. and Lopez, O. (1980) Influence of
gravity loads in seismic response (in Spanish).
Bol. IMME, 18(67), 3-18.
18. ASCE (2017b) Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit
of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-17)
518. doi:10.1061/9780784414859.
19. Dimopoulos, A.I., Bazeos, N., and Beskos, D.E.
(2012) Seismic yield displacements of plane
moment resisting and x-braced steel frames.
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,
41, 128-140, doi:
20. ATC (2008) Quantification of Building
Seismic Per formance Factor s - ATC-63
Project Report 90% Drift (FEMA P695). (A.T.
Council Ed.): Federal Emergency Management
21. Chopra, A.K. (2007) Dynamics of Structures
Theory and Applications to Ear thquake
Engineering. (3rd Ed.): Pearson Education.
22. COSMOS (2018) Strong Motion Virtual Data
Center . Retrieved from www.strongmotioncenter.
23. PEER (2018) NGA-West2 PEER Ground
Motion DataBase. Retrieved from htpps://