Effects of Specimen Saturation on Strength Reduction in Triaxial Tests: Monotonic and Cyclic Case Studies

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Geotechnical Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology(IIEES), Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Earthquake Risk Management Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Degree of saturation of soil is an important factor in preparing specimens of soil in the laboratory. The moisture content of the specimen affects its behavior, especially in undrained loading, either by change of the structure of soil or by change of effective stress path. Even though special equipment is required to measure the change of unsaturated specimen’s geometry, they are not provided in many engineering laboratories due to economic and technical reasons. One alternative for a precise measurement is to saturate the specimens. We show herein that apart from such expensive measurements and saturating the specimens even though it is not saturated in the field, estimating the change of specimen size by simplifying the relevant assumptions and resembling the degree of saturation of the field in the laboratory is to be preferred. Two case studies of monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests are reported herein to show this priority based on field tests and image processing results. It is concluded that given the variation of the degree of saturation of the soil in the field, as well as its volumetric behavior while being sheared, that is, either being compressional or dilative, are essential to make the optimal decision on the selection of the proper degree of saturation at the laboratory.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. ASTM Committee D-4767-11 on Soil and Rock (2020) Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils. ASTM International.
  2. ASTM Committee D-7181-20 on Soil and Rock (2020) Standard Test Method for Consolidated Drained Triaxial Compression Test for Soils. ASTM International.
  3. ASTM Committee D-2850-15 on Soil and Rock (2016) Standard Test Method for Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on Cohesive Soils. ASTM International.
  4. Lade, P.V. (2016) Triaxial Testing of Soils. John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Yoshida, Y., Kuwano, J. and Kuwano, R. (1991) Effects of saturation on shear strength of soils. Soils and Foundations, 31(1), 181-186.
  6. Chu, T.Y. and Chen, S.N. (1976) Laboratory Preparation of Specimens for Simulating Field Moisture Conditions of Partially Saturated Soils. Soil Specimen Preparation for Laboratory Testing, ASTM STP 599, American Society for Testing and Materials, 229-247.
  7. Sun, D.A., Sun, W. and Xiang, L. (2010) Effect of degree of saturation on mechanical behaviour of unsaturated soils and its elastoplastic simulation. Computers and Geotechnics, 37(5), 678-688.
  8. Rosone, M., Airò Farulla, C. and Ferrari, A. (2016) Shear strength of a compacted scaly clay in variable saturation conditions. Acta Geotechnica, 11(1), 37-50.
  9. Duong, T.V., Cui, Y.J., Tang, A.M., Dupla, J.C., Canou, J., Calon, N. and Robinet, A. (2016) Effects of water and fines contents on the resilient modulus of the interlayer soil of railway substructure. Acta Geotechnica, 11(1), 51-59.
  10. Dutta, T.T., Saride, S. and Jallu, M. (2017) Effect of saturation on dynamic properties of compacted clay in a resonant column test. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 12(3), 181-190.
  11. Wild, K.M., Barla, M., Turinetti, G. and Amann, F. (2017) A multi-stage triaxial testing procedure for low permeable geomaterials applied to Opalinus Clay. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9(3), 519-530.
  12. Blackmore, L., Clayton, C.R., Powrie, W., Priest, J.A. and Otter, L. (2020) Saturation and its effect on the resilient modulus of a pavement formation material. Géotechnique, 70(4), 292-302.
  13. Reznik, Y.M. (1992) Determination of deformation properties of collapsible soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal,15(3), 248-255.
  14. Rao, S.M., Sridharan, A. and Ramanath, K.P. (1995) Collapse behavior of an artificially cemented clayey silt. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 18(3), 334-341.
  15. Wong, J.C., Rahardjo, H., Toll, D.G. and Leong, E.C. (2001) Modified triaxial apparatus for shearing-infiltration test. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 24(4), 370-380.
  16. Cho, W., Holman, T.P., Jung, Y.H. and Finno, R.J. (2007) Effects of swelling during saturation in triaxial tests in clays. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 30(5), 378-386.
  17. Elkady, T.Y., Houston, S.L. and Houston, W.N. (2011) Static and Dynamic Behavior of Hydro-Collapsible Soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 34(5), 537-550.
  18. Haeri, S.M., Garakani, A.A., Khosravi, A. and Meehan, C.L. (2014) Assessing the hydro-mechanical behavior of collapsible soils using a modified triaxial test device. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 37(2), 190-204.
  19. Wang, Y., Xie, W. and Gao, G. (2019) Effect of different moisture content and triaxial test methods on shear strength characteristics of loess. In E3S Web of Conferences, 92, 07007 EDP Sciences.
  20. ASTM Committee D2487-17e1 on Soil and Rock (2020) Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International.
  21. ARCA Saze Corporation (2016) Report of Field Tests at the Site of North of Tehran, Ordered by the International Institute of Earthquake and Seismology, Tehran, Iran.
  22. Jahankhah, H., Nazari, S. and Jalili, J. (2022) Increasing the accuracy of two-dimensional image processing techniques to estimate stress-strain curves in triaxial tests. Sharif Journal of Civil Engineering (in Persian).
  23. ASTM Committee D-5311-13 on Soil and Rock (2021) Standard Test Method for Load Controlled Cyclic Triaxial Strength of Soil. ASTM International.
Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 1
January 2021
Pages 9-18

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics