Investigation of Characteristics of Decay Parameters Kappa Based on Iranian Dataset

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Professor, Seismological Research Center, International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

3 International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The decay parameter κ (Kappa) which was, first, presented by Anderson and Hough (1984) is commonly used to represent the observed decay of acceleration spectrum at high frequencies. It is considered that κ has a direct linear relationship with distance. The intercept of this line is called κ0, which is a site-dependent component, and it is supposed to be due to attenuation of seismic waves in near-surface layers. Nowadays, these decay parameters have various applications such as estimation of attenuation function in the square-root-impedance method or implementation of host to target method in ground motion prediction equations. However, the characteristics of both κ and κ0 have not been studied, as it deserves.
 In the present paper, the decay parameter κ is obtained by the classical approach using 1157 records from all over Iran. The linearity of κ-distance relationship is questioned and investigated for different distances. It is found that the slope of κ-distance relationship reduces significantly at greater distances, and therefore, a linear correlation equation could not predict well enough specially for great distances. Furthermore, the log-likelihood (LLH) criterion is applied to select the best model that correlates κ0 with VS30 for different seismotectonic provinces of Iran. This criterion which is based on information theory yields that a linear equation can be a better correlation than a rational one. No asymptote value is observed for κ0 at high values of VS30.     

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Anderson, J.G., and Hough, S.E. (1984) A model for the shape of the Fourier spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 74, 1969-1993.
  2. Anderson, J.G. (1991) A preliminary descriptive model for the distance dependence of the spectral decay parameter in southern California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 81, 2186–2193.
  3. Motazedian, D. (2006) Region-specific key seismic parameters for earthquakes in Northern Iran. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, 1383–1395.
  4. Campbell, K.W. (2009) Estimates of shear-wave Q and κ0 for unconsolidated and semiconsolidated sediments in Eastern North America. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 99, 2365-2392.
  5. Soghrat, M.R., Khaji, N. and Zafarani, H. (2012) Simulation of strong ground motion in northern Iran using the specific barrier model. Geophys. J. Int., 188, 645–679.
  6. Fu, L. and Li, X. (2016) The Characteristics of high-frequency attenuation of shear
    waves in the Longmen Shan and adjacent regions. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 106(5), 1979-1990.
  7. Castro, R., Pacor, F., Sala, A. and Petrungaro, C. (1996) S wave attenuation and site effects in the region of Friuli, Italy. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 22355–22369.
  8. Purvance, M.D. and Anderson J.G. (2003) A comprehensive study of the observed spectral decay in strong-motion accelerations recorded in Guerrero, Mexico. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93, 600–611.
  9. Ktenidou, O.J., Cotton, F., Abrahamson, N.A. and Anderson, J.G. (2014) Taxonomy of κ: A review of definitions and estimation approaches targeted to applications. Seismol. Res. Lett. 85, 135–146.
  10. Ktenidou, O.J., Abrahamson, N.A., Drouet, S. and Cotton F. (2015) Understanding the physics of kappa (κ): Insights from a downhole array. Geophys. J. Int., 203, 678–691.
  11. Silva, W., Darragh, R., Gregor, N., Martin, G., Abrahamson, N. and Kircher, C. (1999). Reassessment of site coefficients and near-fault factors or building code provisions. Tech. Rept. Program Element II: 98-HQ-GR-1010, Pacific Engineering and Analysis, El Cerrito,
    California.
  12. Van Houtte, C., Drouet, S. and Cotton, F. (2011) Analysis of the origins of κ (kappa) to compute hard rock to rock adjustment factors for GMPEs. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 101, 2926-2941.
  13. Edwards, B. (2012) Site specific kappa, Technical Report SED/PRP/R/035b/20120410, Swiss seismological service, Zurich, Switzerland.
  14. Ktenidou, O.J., Cotton, F., Chaljub, E., Drouet, S., Theodoulidis, N. and Arnaouti S. (2012) Estimation of kappa (κ) for a sedimentary basin in Greece (EUROSEISTEST) - correlation to site. Proc. 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon.
  15. Pavel, F. and R., Vacareanu (2015) Kappa and regional attenuation for Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes. J. Seismol., 19, 791-799.
  16. Boore, D.M. and Joyner, W.B. (1997) Site Amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 327-341.
  17. Huang, M.W., Wang, J.H., Ma, K.F., Wang, C.Y., Hung, J.H. and Wen, K.L. (2007) Frequency-dependent site amplifications with f ≥ 0.01 Hz evaluated from velocity and density models in Central Taiwan. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, 624–637.
  18. Jahanandish, M., Zafarani, H. and Shafiee, A.H. (2016) Implementation of the square-root-impedance method to estimate site amplification in Iran using random profile generation. Bull Seismol Soc Am., 107, 456-467.
  19. Zafarani, H. and Soghrat, M. (2012) Simulation of ground motion in the Zagros region of Iran using the specific barrier model and the stochastic method. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 102, 2031-2045.
  20. Toro, G.R., Abrahamson, N.A. and Schneider, J.F. (1997) Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: Best estimates and uncertainties. Seismol. Res. Lett., 68, 41–57.
  21. Atkinson, G.M. and Boore, D.M. (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, 2181–2205.
  22. Campbell, K.W. (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93, 1012–1033.
  23. Zafarani, H., Noorzad, A., Ansari, A. and Bargi, K. (2009) Stochastic modeling of Iranian earthquakes and estimation of ground motion for future earthquakes in Greater Tehran. Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 29, 722–741.
  24. Cotton, F., Scherbaum, F., Bommer, J.J. and Bungum, H. (2006) Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target regions: Application to central Europe and rock sites. J. Seismol., 10, 137-156.
  25. Mai, P.M., Imperatori, W. and Olsen, K.B. (2010) Hybrid broadband groundmotion simulations: combining long-period deterministic synthetics with high-frequency multiple S-to-S backscattering. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100(5), 2124–2142.
  26. Vahidifard, H., Zafarani, H. and Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R. (2017) Hybrid broadband simulation of strong-motion records from the September 16, 1978, Tabas, Iran, earthquake (Mw 7.4). Natural Hazards, 87, 57-81.
  27. Pezeshk, S., Zandieh, A., Campbell, K.W. and Tavakoli, B. (2018) Ground-motion prediction equations for central and eastern North America using the hybrid empirical method and NGA-West2 empirical ground-motion models. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 108, 2278–2304.
  28. Drouet, S., Cotton, F. and Guéguen, P. (2010) VS30, κ, regional attenuation
    and Mw from small magnitude events accelerograms. Geophys. J. Int., 182, 880–898.
  29. Oth, A., Bindi, D., Parolai, S. and Giacomo, D.D. (2011) Spectral analysis of
    K-NET and KiK-net data in Japan, Part II: On attenuation characteristics, source spectra, and site response of borehole and surface stations. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 101, 667–687.
  30. Silva, W.J. and Darragh, R. (1995). Engineering characterization of earthquake strong ground motion recorded at rock sites. Palo Alto, Electric Power Research Institute, TR-102261.
  31. Edwards, B., Faeh, D. and Giardini, D. (2011) Attenuation of seismic shear wave energy in Switzerland. Geophys. J. Int., 185, 967–984.
  32. Zafarani, H. and Soghrat, M. (2017) A selected dataset of the Iranian strong motion records. Natural Hazards, 86, 1307-1332.
  33. Scherbaum, F., Delavaud, E. and Riggelsen, C. (2009) Model selection in seismic hazard analysis: An information-theoretic perspective. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 99, 3234–3247.
  34. Mousavi, M., Zafarani, H., Rahpeyma, S. and Azarbakht, A. (2014) Test of goodness of the NGA ground-motion equations to predict the strong motions of the 2012 Ahar–Varzaghan dual earthquakes in northwestern Iran. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 104, 2512–2528.
  35. Shafiee, A.H., Zafarani, H. and Jahanandish, M. (2016) Model selection for correlating VS30 with average shear-wave velocities at lower depths based on the Iranian data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 106, 289–299.
  36. Mirzaei, N., Mengtan, G. and Yuntai, C. (1998) Seismic source regionalization for seismic zoning of Iran: major seismotectonic provinces. J. Earthq. Pred. Res., 7, 465–495.
Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 3
August 2021
Pages 1-9

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics