Evaluation of the Matched-Filter Approach for Detecting Seismic Phases, Case Study on a Local Network

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Seismology, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Seismological Research Center, Department of Geology, International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (IIEES), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The first step in many seismological studies is identifying and locating the seismic events. The small magnitude earthquakes, due to their rate of occurrence and abundance, are of great importance to seismologists, contrary to the engineers and city residents. However, due to the attenuation of seismic waves and the unavoidable noise in the seismic stations, very dense seismographic networks are required for detecting small events. The Matched-Filter technique is an approach based on signal processing, which makes it possible for seismologists to identify the seismic phases with very low signal-to-noise ratios by improving the detection capability of the seismic networks in case of repeating events. The goal of this study is to depict the points that must be considered when employing the Matched-Filter approach. As a result, sensitivity tests were performed on each parameter to demonstrate their importance and effectiveness in influencing the outcomes of utilizing this technique on a local seismic network. The statistical studies revealed that selecting incorrect values reduces the quality of the identifications and may potentially result in mistakes. Finally, depending on the assessments and settings chosen, this method utilized to process 95 days of continuous data from a local temporary seismographic network demonstrates the technique's capability.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Adushkin, V., Bobrov, D., Kitov, I., Rozhkov, M., & Sanina, I. (2017). Remote detection of aftershock activity as a new method of seismic monitoring. Doklady Earth Sciences,
Beyreuther, M., Barsch, R., Krischer, L., Megies, T., Behr, Y., & Wassermann, J. (2010). ObsPy: A Python toolbox for seismology. Seismological Research Letters, 81(3), 530-533.
Bobrov, D., Kitov, I., & Zerbo, L. (2014). Perspectives of cross-correlation in seismic monitoring at the international data centre. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 171, 439-468.
Bondár, I., Myers, S. C., Engdahl, E. R., & Bergman, E. A. (2004). Epicentre accuracy based on seismic network criteria. Geophysical Journal International, 156(3), 483-496.
Chamberlain, C. J., Boese, C. M., & Townend, J. (2017). Cross-correlation-based detection and characterisation of microseismicity adjacent to the locked, late-interseismic Alpine Fault, South Westland, New Zealand. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 457, 63-72.
Chamberlain, C. J., Hopp, C. J., Boese, C. M., Warren‐Smith, E., Chambers, D., Chu, S. X., Michailos, K., & Townend, J. (2018). EQcorrscan: Repeating and near‐repeating earthquake detection and analysis in Python. Seismological Research Letters, 89(1), 173-181.
Chamberlain, C. J., Shelly, D. R., Townend, J., & Stern, T. A. (2014). Low‐frequency earthquakes reveal punctuated slow slip on the deep extent of the Alpine Fault, New Zealand. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(7), 2984-2999.
Dodge, D., & Walter, W. (2015). Initial global seismic cross‐correlation results: Implications for empirical signal detectors. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105(1), 240-256.
Frank, W. B., & Abercrombie, R. E. (2018). Adapting the Matched‐Filter Search to a Wide‐Aperture Network: An Aftershock Sequence and an Earthquake Swarm in ConnecticutShort Note. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(1), 524-532.
Gibbons, S. J., & Ringdal, F. (2006). The detection of low magnitude seismic events using array-based waveform correlation. Geophysical Journal International, 165(1), 149-166.
Gibbons, S. J., Sørensen, M. B., Harris, D. B., & Ringdal, F. (2007). The detection and location of low magnitude earthquakes in northern Norway using multi-channel waveform correlation at regional distances. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 160(3-4), 285-309.
Lahr, J. (1999). revised 2012, HYPOELLIPSE: a computer program for determining location earthquake hypocentral parameters, magnitude, and first-motion pattern. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 99-23.
McNamara, D. E., & Buland, R. P. (2004). Ambient noise levels in the continental United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94(4), 1517-1527.
Schaff, D. P., & Richards, P. G. (2014). Improvements in magnitude precision, using the statistics of relative amplitudes measured by cross correlation. Geophysical Journal International, 197(1), 335-350.
Schaff, D. P., & Waldhauser, F. (2010). One magnitude unit reduction in detection threshold by cross correlation applied to Parkfield (California) and China seismicity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(6), 3224-3238.
Shelly, D. R., & Hill, D. P. (2011). Migrating swarms of brittle‐failure earthquakes in the lower crust beneath Mammoth Mountain, California. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(20).
Vuan, A., Sugan, M., Amati, G., & Kato, A. (2018). Improving the Detection of Low‐Magnitude Seismicity Preceding the Mw 6.3 L’Aquila Earthquake: Development of a Scalable Code Based on the Cross Correlation of Template EarthquakesImproving the Detection of Low‐Magnitude Seismicity Preceding the Mw 6.3 L’Aquila Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(1), 471-480.
Waldhauser, F., & Ellsworth, W. L. (2000). A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the northern Hayward fault, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(6), 1353-1368.
Warren‐Smith, E., Chamberlain, C. J., Lamb, S., & Townend, J. (2017). High‐precision analysis of an aftershock sequence using matched‐filter detection: The 4 May 2015 ML 6 Wanaka earthquake, Southern Alps, New Zealand. Seismological Research Letters, 88(4), 1065-1077.
Zhang, M., & Wen, L. (2015). An effective method for small event detection: Match and locate (M&L). Geophysical Journal International, 200(3), 1523-1537.
Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 4
November 2021
Pages 15-35

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics