Heat Induction Technique for Seismic Retrofit of Steel Beam to Column Connections

Document Type : Structural Earthquake Engineering


Semnan University, Semnan


The concrete slab in existing buildings presents a problem for economic considerations in seismic retrofit projects. Unless the concrete slab is removed, it is impossible to modify the top flange and its welded joint. Meanwhile, as the majority of reported damages occurred in the bottom flange of the beam during the past earthquakes, it is anticipated that modifying only the bottom flange may be sufficient to significantly improve the performance of the steel frame connections. Making a ductile fuse in the beam section through weakening and gaining the most possible plastic behavior from the beam can be a suitable solution. In current research, a new and practical rehabilitation scheme based on heat induction to the bottom flange of the beam was developed and experimentally validated. Accordingly, three large-scale steel moment frame connections containing one reference (Pre-Northridge) and two retrofitted connections were tested under cyclic loads. The experimental results showed near weld fracture in the reference specimen at story drift of 5.5 % with no qualified plastic behavior for special moment frames.In connections retrofitted through heat induction (annealing of the beam material), plastic hinge occurred at 6% story drift in weakened section far enough from the column face. The main advantage of this technique was low stress demands in near-weld region. Meanwhile, as the beam was heated with no material removal, the out of plane buckling resistance was similar to that of the reference specimen. Strength degradation of the retrofitted connections occurred gradually with no brittle failure as opposed to the reference specimen. The retrofit technique can be easily achieved through a handmade torch and a laser thermometer that simplifies its application in situ.


  1. Saleh, A., Mirghaderi, S.R., and Zahrai, S.M. (2016) Cyclic testing of tubular web RBS connections in deep beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 117, 214-226.
  2. Tsavdaridis, K.D. and Papadopoulos, Th. (2016) A FE parametric study of RWS beam-to-column bolted connections with cellular beams. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 116, 92-113.
  3. Budhi, L., Sukamta and Partono, W. (2017) Optimization analysis of size and distance of hexagonal hole in castellated steel beams. Procedia Engineering, 171, 1092-1099.
  4. Tsavdaridis, K.D., Faghih, F., and Nikitas, N. (2014) Assessment of perforated steel beam to- column connections subjected to cyclic loading. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 18, 1302-1325.
  5. Yang, Q. and Yang, N. (2009) Seismic behaviors of steel moment resisting frames with opening in beam web. J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(6), 1323-1336.
  6. Wilkinson, S., Hurdman, G., and Crouther, A. (2006) A moment resisting connection for earthquake resisting structure. J. Constr. Steel Res., 62, 295-302.
  7. Mirghaderi, S.R., Torabian, S., and Imanpour, A. (2010) Seismic performance of the accordion web RBS connection. J. Constr. Steel Res., 66, 277-288.
  8. Saleh, A., Zahrai, S.M., and Mirghaderi, S.R. (2017) The Tubular Web RBS connection to improve seismic behavior of moment resisting steel frames. Scientia Iranica , 24(6), 2726-2740.
  9. Elgaaly, M., Hamlton, R., and Seshadri, A. (1997) Shear strength of beams with corrugated webs. J. Struct. Eng., 122(4), 390-398.
  10. Myoungsu, Sh., Kim, S.-P., Halterman, A., and Aschheim, M. (2017) Seismic toughness and failure mechanisms of reduced web-section beams: Phase 1 tests. Engineering Structures, 141, 198-216.
  11. Atashzaban, A., Hajirasouliha, I., Ahmady Jazany, R., and Izadinia, M. (2015) Optimum drilled flange moment resisting connections for seismic regions. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 112, 325-338.
  12. Engelhardt, M.D., Fry, G.T., Jones, S.L., Venti, M.J., and Holliday, S.D. (2000) Behavior and Design of Radius-Cut, Reduced Beam Section Connections. SAC/BD-00/17. Sacramento, California, SAC Joint Venture.
  13. Lee, C.H., Kim, J.H., Jeon, S.W., and Kim, J.H. (2004) Influence of panel zone strength and beam web connection method on seismic performance of reduced beam section steel moment
  14. connections. Proceedings of the CTBUH 2004 Seoul Conference - Tall Buildings for Historical Cities, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, Bethlehem, PA.
  15. Fema 547 (2006) Techniques for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  16. Civjan, S.A., Engelhardt, M.D., and Gross, J.L. (2000) Retrofit of Pre-Northridge Moment- Resisting Connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 445-452.
  17. Brandon, Ch., Uang, Ch-M., and Chen, A. (2006) Seismic rehabilitation of pre-Northridge steel moment connections: A case study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62(8), 783-792.
  18. SAC Joint Venture (2000) Cyclic Response of RBS Moment Connections: Loading Sequence and Lateral Bracing Effects. Rep. No. SAC/BD-00/22.
  19. AISC (2011) Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.
  20. Bramfitt, B.L. (1991) Annealing of Steel. Heat Treating. ASM Handbook, vol. 4. ASM International, 42-55.
  21. Bahirai, M. and Gerami, M. (2019) Post fire mechanical properties of Iranian structural steel. Submitted to International Journal of Steel Structure.
  22. Verhoeven, J.D. (1975) Fundamentals of Physical Metallurgy. Wiley, New York.
  23. Popov, E.P., Amin, N.R., Louie, J.C., and Stephen, R.M. (1986) Cyclic behavior of large beam-column assemblies. Eng. J., 23(1), 9-23.
  24. ABAQUS (2010) Standard Analysis User's Manual v. 6.10. SIMULIA.