Preliminary Assessment of the Operational Dam's Performance in November 12, 2017 Sarpol-e Zahab Earthquake

Document Type : Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Authors

1 University of Tehran

2 Iran Water Resource Management Company

3 Kermanshah Regional Water Company

Abstract

Following the November 12, 2017 Sarpol-e Zahab earthquake with a magnitude of 7.3 in Richter scale, emergency inspection of dams has been performed for dams located at the epicentral distance of 125 km, according to the ICOLD recommendations. In the mentioned zone, there are 16 impounded operational storage dams. Inspected dams had no apparent significant damages and only some thin cracks had been observed in Tange-Hamam Dam that is a non-homogenous embankment dam and the closest operational dam to the epicenter of the earthquake, with a distance of 25 km from the epicenter. There were some defects such as longitudinal cracks and some tiny transversal cracks on the crest of the dam as well as some vertical cracks in the spillway's left approach wall. Regarding the observed evidence, more precise investigations of the dambehavior were performed through the instrumentation data. Settlement measuring on magnetic plates shows the settlement of 13 cmnear the embankment surface at the middle of the damcrest, which is about 0.22 of the dam height. This rate of strain has been compared with some published international experiences, which generally shows the acceptable performance of the dam. To ensure the safety of the dam, monitoring of all instruments should be continued, as well as the precise geodetic measuring in the dam body, which is in progress now.

Keywords

References

  1. Bollinger, G.A. (1977) 'Reinterpretation of the intensity data for the 1886 Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake'. In Studies Related to the Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake of 1886 - A Preliminary Report. Rankin, D.W. (ed.), U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1028, 17-32.
  2. USCOLD (1992) Observed Performance of Dams During Earthquakes, Volume I. United States Society on Dams, 129p.
  3. USCOLD (2000) Observed Performance of Dams During Earthquakes, Volume II. United States Society on Dams, 162p.
  4. USCOLD (2014) Observed Performance of Dams During Earthquakes, Volume III. United States Society on Dams, 121p.
  5. Tani, S. (2000) Behavior of large fill dams during earthquake and earthquake damage. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 20, 223-229.
  6. Seed, H.B., Lee, K.L., and Idriss, I.M. (1969) Analysis of Sheffield dam failure. ASCE Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 95(SM6), 1453-1490.
  7. Moriwaki, Y., Tan, P., and Ji, F. (1998) Seismic deformation analysis of the Upper San Fernando Dam under the 1971 San Fernando earthquake. Proceeding of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, III, American Society of Civil Engineers, 854-865.
  8. Seed, H.B., Lee, K.L., Idriss, I.M., and Makdisi, F.I. (1975) The slides in the San Fernando Dams during the earthquake of February 9, 1971. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 101(GT7), 651-688.
  9. Castro, G., Poulos, S.J., and Leathers, F.D. (1985) A re-examination of the slide of the lower San Fernando dam. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 111(GT9).
  10. Krinitzsky, E.L. and Hynes, M.E. (2002) The Bhuj, India, earthquake: lessons learned for earthquake safety of dams on alluvium. Engineering Geology, 66, 163-196.
  11. Singh, R., Roy, D., and Jain, S.K. (2005) Analysis of earth dams affected by the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake. Engineering Geology, 80, 282-291.
  12. Yamaguchi, Y., Kondo,M., and Kobori, T. (2012) Safety inspections and seismic behavior of embankment dams during the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku earthquake. Soils and Foundations, 52, 945-955.
  13. Chen, G., Jin, D., Mao, J., Gao, H., Wang, Z., Jing, L., and Li, X. (2014) Seismic damage and behavior analysis of earth dams during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China. Engineering Geology, 180, 99-129.
  14. Zhang, J.M., Yang, Z.Y., Gao, X.Z., and Zhang, J.H. (2015) Geotechnical aspects and seismic damage of the 156-m-high Zipingpu concrete faced rockfill dam following the Ms 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 76, 145-156.
  15. Biederman, R. (1985) Dam safety in Switzerland, Swiss Dams - Monitoring and Maintenance. Swiss National Committee on Large Dams, Switzerland.
  16. Pougatsch, H., Müller, R.W., and Kobelt, A. (1998) Water alarm concept in Switzerland. Proceedings of the International Symposium on new Trends and Guidelines on Dam Safety, Barcelona, Spain, Berga ed. Balkema, Rotterdam, 235-242.
  17. Emami, K. (2014) The historic kurit dam: An illustrative example of water wisdom. Irrigation and Drainage, 63, 246-253.
  18. ODSS (2013) Guideline for Seismic Analysis and Design of Earth and Rockfill Dams. Office of Deputy for Strategic Supervision, Dept. of Technical Affairs. Publication No. 624.
  19. Hessami, K., Jamali, J., and Tabassi, H. (2003) Major Active Faults of Iran. Seismotectonic Department, Seismology Research Centre, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology.
  20. Hessami, K. and Jamali, J. (2006) Explanatory notes to the map of major active faults of Iran. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 8(1), 1-11.
  21. IBCS (2015) Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Standard No. 2800. 4th Edition, Iranian Building Codes and Standards, Road, Housing
  22. and Urban Development Research Center.
  23. ICOLD (1983) Seismicity and Dam Design. Bulletins No. 46, Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design, International Commission on Large Dams, Paris.
  24. ICOLD (1988) Inspection of Dams Following Earthquakes - Guidelines. Bulletins No. 62, Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design, International Commission on LargeDams, Paris.
  25. IRSC (2017) Report on the November 12, 2017 M 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab Kermanshah Earthquake. Iranian Seismological Center, Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran.
  26. Abfan Consulting Engineer (2012) Summary Report of Tange Hamam Storage Dam Project. Report No: 86021-910601.
  27. Pells, S. and Fell, R. (2003) Damage and cracking of embankment dams by earthquake and the implications for internal erosion and piping. Proc. 21st Internal Congress on Large Dams, Montreal, ICOLD, Paris Q83-R17, International Commission on Large Dams, Paris.
  28. Swaisgood, J.R. (1998) Seismically-induced deformation of embankment dams. Proc. U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Washington.
  29. Swaisgood, J.R. (2014) Behavior of embankment dams during earthquake. Journal ofDamSafety, ASDSO, 12(2), 35-44.
  30. Bureau, G., Volpe, R.L., Roth,W.R., and Udaka, T. (1985) Seismic Analysis of Concrete Face Rockfill Dams. ASCE Int. Symp. on CFRD's, Detroit, Oct. 21, in Concrete Face Rockfill Dams - Design, Construction and Performance, 479-508, and Closure (1987), ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Eng. Div., 113(10), 1255-1264.
  31. Campbell, K.W. and Bozorgnia, Y. (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthquake Spectra, 4(1), 139-171.
  32. Abrahamson, N.A. and Silva W.J. (2008) Summary of the Abrahamson and Silva NGA ground-motion relations. Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 67-97.
  33. Chiou, B.S.-J. and Youngs, R.R. (2008) AnNGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 173-215.
  34. Farzanegan, E., Pour Mohamad Shahvar, M., MirSanjari, M., Eshaghi, A., Abdollahi, H., and Mirzaei, H. (2017) Preliminary Report of Accelerometer Network on the November 12, 2017 M 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab Kermanshah Earthquake. Iran StrongMotionNetwork, Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center.
  35. Swaisgood, J.R. (2003) Embankment dam deformations caused by earthquakes. Proc. 2003 Pacific Conf. Earthq. Eng., 40, 1-8.
Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
November 2018
Pages 13-24

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics